Color and surface roughness alterations of bulk-fill resin composites submitted to simulated toothbrushing with whitening dentifrices

Aim: To evaluate the surface roughness and color stability of bulk-fill resin composites after simulated toothbrushing with whitening dentifrices. The radioactive/relative dentin abrasion (RDA) and radioactive/relative enamel abrasion (REA) of dentifrices were also assessed. Methods: Specimens (n=10) of Tetric N Ceram Bulk Fill (TNCB), Filtek One Bulk Fill (FOB) resin composites, and Z100(Control) were prepared using a cylindrical Teflon matrix. Surface roughness (Ra, µm) was assessed by a roughness meter and the color evaluations (ΔEab , ΔE00 , WID ) were performed using a digital spectrophotometer based on the CIELAB system. Three measurements were performed per sample, before and after simulated toothbrushing with 3D Oral-B White Perfection (3DW) and Black is White (BW) dentifrices. The abrasivity (REA and RDA values) of the used dentifrices was also determined by the Hefferren abrasivity test. Results: The Ra values increased significantly in all resin composites after 3DW and BW toothbrushing. The acceptable threshold color varied among resin composites, and TNCB and Z100 presented the highest ΔEab and ΔE00 for BW dentifrice. The 3DW dentifrice was significantly more abrasive than BW dentifrice on enamel and dentin. Conclusions: simulated toothbrushing with tested whitening dentifrices increased the surface roughness at acceptable levels. The Tetric N Ceram Bulk-fill and Z100 composite showed the highest color alteration in BW. 3D White Perfection dentifrice was more abrasive on dentin and enamel than Black is White.

Bond strength of bulk-fill resin composites: the effect of cavity preparation and aging

Aim: Evaluating the resin-dentin bond strength of Class II conventional and bulk-fill composite restorations, using different cavity sizes before and after aging. Methods: Seventy-five human molars were distributed into groups according to the buccolingual width of the cavities, conservative (n=25) and extended (n=50). They were divided according to the restorative material: conventional (Z100/control group) or bulk-fill resin composites (Filtek Bulk Fill/FBF; Tetric N Ceram Bulk Fill/TNCBF; Filtek Bulk Fill Flow/FBFF; Surefill SDR flow/SDR). The restored teeth were sectioned on sticks (n=50 per restorative materials + width cavities group), half were stored in Water/Ethanol 75% for 30 days and the other half were submitted to the immediate microtensile bond strength (µTBS) test. Data were analyzed applying the Three-Way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), Bonferroni test, test t, and Weibull analyses (p<0.05). Results: SDR and FBF presented lower µTBSvalues for extended preparation when compared to the conservative preparation, before aging. After aging, only for the FBFF, a decrease in the µTBSvalues was observed. Comparing the µTBSvalues, before and after aging, the SDR demonstrated lower µTBSvalues after aging when the conservative cavity was used. A decrease in the µTBSvalues was observed for the Z100, the FBF and, the FBFF, after aging, when the extended cavity was used. Conclusion: The effect of cavity preparation and aging on the resin-dentin of Class II is material dependent. Most of the bulk-fill resin composites evaluated presented a similar performance to the conventional resin composites for all the conditions of this study

Bond strength of universal adhesive applied to dry and wet dentin: one-year in vitro evaluation

Aim: This study evaluated the influence of dentin wettability on the immediate and extended microtensile bond strength (mTBS) of a universal adhesive system used in the etch-and-rinse strategy. Methods: Twenty human third molars were selected and divided into four groups according to the adhesive system and dentin wettability. The mTBS values of each group were registered 24 h and one year after adhesive system application and resin composite block build-up (n=30). Data were analyzed by the t-test (p<0.05). Results: When both adhesive systems were compared, there was no statistically significant difference when they were applied following wet bonding (p>0.05). However, the dry bonding reduced µTBS values of the Adper Single Bond 2 adhesive (p<0.05). Regarding storage time, both groups presented similar µTBS values at 24 h and one year (p>0.05). Conclusions: Therefore, the Scotchbond Universal Adhesive can be applied to dry or wet dentin without compromising the etch-and-rinse bonding quality and the durability of the restorations

The effect of a bleaching agent on the pigment removal and the bond strength of bulk-fill resin composites: an in vitro study / Efeito dos agentes clareadores na remoção de pigmentos e na resistência de união de resinas compostas bulk-fill: um estudo in vitro

Introduction: In order to simplify the technique, reduce the time required for direct adhesive restorations, bulk-fill resin composites have been developed be applied in bulk placement up to 4 mm increments. Objective: Evaluating the color change (ΔE) and the microtensile bond strength (μTBS) of bulk fill resin composites (BFRC) to dentin after the immersion in regular beverages and the application of bleaching systems. Method: Forty-five human molar teeth were randomly distributed in three groups according to the filling material (n=15): Filtek Bulk Fill, Tetric N Ceram Bulk Fill and Filtek Z100. The restored teeth were immersed in coffee, wine and distilled water (n=5) for 72 hours. The color parameters were measured using a spectrophotometer, having as basis the CIE L*a*b*, before and after tooth staining and application of bleaching processes. Subsequently, the teeth were sectioned to obtain the specimens for the microtensile testing. The ΔE values were analyzed applying the Kruskal-Wallis and the Wilcoxon tests, and the μTBS values were analyzed applying the ANOVA and the Bonferroni tests (p<0.05). Result: There were no significant differences in the ∆E values when comparing the BFRCs to the conventional resin composite (CRC) in most of the experimental groups. The ∆E values did not present significant differences before and after the application of bleaching processes for all the tested resin composites. The BFRCs presented higher μTBS values than the CRC after exposure to distilled water, wine and bleaching agent. Conclusion: The studied BFRCs presented similar color stability to the CRC. The BFRCs presented higher bond strength to the dentin than the CTC in most of the evaluated conditions. The bleaching agent was not effective in whitening the stained restored teeth.

Introdução: Em busca de simplificar a técnica, reduzir o tempo requerido para as restaurações adesivas, resinas compostas bulk-fill (RCBF) estão sendo desenvolvidas para serem aplicadas em incrementos com espessura de até 4 mm. Objetivo: Avaliar a alteração de cor (ΔE) e resistência de união (μTBS) de RCBF a dentina após imersão em bebidas e aplicação de um sistema clareador. Método: Foram utilizados 45 dentes molares humanos que foram distribuídos aleatoriamente em três grupos de acordo com o material restaurador (n=15): Filtek Bulk Fill, Tetric N Ceram Bulk Fill e Filtek Z100. Os dentes restaurados foram imersos em café, vinho e água destilada (n=5) durante 72 horas. Os parâmetros de cor foram mensurados utilizando um espectrofotômetro, tendo como base o CIE L*a*b*, antes e após o manchamento e aplicação dos agentes clareadores. Consequentemente, os dentes foram seccionados para a obtenção de espécimes para o teste de microtração. Os valores de ΔE foram analisados aplicando os testes de Kruskal-Wallis e Wilcoxon e os valores de μTBS foram analisados aplicando ANOVA e o teste de Bonferroni (p<0,05). Resultado: Não houve diferença significante nos valores de ∆E quando as RCBFs foram comparadas a resina composta convencional (RCC) na maioria dos grupos experimentais. Os valores de ∆E não apresentaram diferença estatística antes e após a aplicação do agente clareador para todas as resinas testadas. As RCBFs demonstraram maiores valores de μTBS comparado a RCC após exposição a água destilada, vinho e agente clareador. Conclusão: As RCBFs demonstraram uma similar estabilidade de cor quando comparado a RCC. As RCBFs apresentaram maior resistência de união a dentina que a RCC na maioria das condições avaliadas. O agente clareador não foi efetivo no clareamento dos dentes restaurados.